Psychomike
Male
Chicago
   

<< May 2008 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed


May 11, 2008
Lincoln's Mass Lynching!

A  sketch of the scene depicted on this site's homepage, the execution of thirty-eight Sioux on December 26, 1862, used to fascinate me when, as a boy in Mankato, Minnesota, I would visit the Blue Earth County Historical Museum.  Apart from its macabre appeal, the picture impressed me because it captured the most famous event in the history of my hometown

The execution of 38 Sioux at Mankato, Minnesota on December 26, 1862.
The hanging, following trials which condemned over three hundred participants in the 1862 Dakota Conflict, stands as the largest mass execution in American history. Only the unpopular intervention of President Lincoln saved 265 other Dakota and mixed-bloods from the fate met by the less fortunate thirty-eight.  The mass hanging was the concluding scene in the opening chapter of a story of the American-Sioux conflict that would not end until the Seventh Calvary completed its massacre at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, on December   29, 1890. http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/dakota/Dak_account.html
 
Cartoon History Of The Mass Hangings Of 38 Sioux In 1862: The Lakota Conflict Trials!
 
What was justice and the court system like under Lincoln?
 
The largest mass lynching in American history.
 
To commemorate the hundredth anniversary of the Sioux Uprising in 1962, the St. Paul Pioneer Press published "The Picture Story of the Sioux Uprising" by Jerry Fearing.  The cartoon sets below are taken from that much larger work.
Cartoon Set 1: Trials and Execution

Cartoon Set 2: First Violence

Cartoon Set 3: Last Battle  & Surrender

Set 1:Trials and Executions

 
On September 28, 1862, two days after the Indians released their white prisoners to Col. Sibley, a military court began trying the Sioux braves.  Five officers, with the Rev. Stephen Riggs as interpreter, were to decide which warriors were guilty of taking part in the uprising.

 
The way the Conflict Trials are propagandized to us when they are mentioned at all, is that the intervention of President Lincoln saved lives. Closer examination however, allows us to understand what it means to have military tribunals try cases.
 
Lincoln fans don't like to ask if those executed knew english, had a lawyer, or even knew what they were being executed for! 
 
The links today are a fascinating look from a legal perspective at the trial I call- 
A Mass Lynching. 
 
How Fair Were the Dakota Conflict Trials?

FOR A MORE DETAILED EXPLORATION OF THESE ISSUES, SEE CAROL CHOMSKY'S ARTICLE IN 43 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 13 (1990) ENTITLED "THE UNITED STATES-DAKOTA WAR TRIALS: A STUDY  IN MILITARY  INJUSTICE."

Were the proceedings fair?
        Did the Commission allow adequate time to consider the evidence?
        Should the accused have been provided with counsel?
        Were the verdicts supported by the evidence?
        Were Commission members prejudiced against the accused?

Should the accused have been viewed as legitimate belligerents of a sovereign nation rather than as common criminals?

Was the Commission authorized by law to conduct the trials?

Dakota Conflict Trials Homepage

 

Posted at 07:21 am by Psychomike

 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry