<< June 2008 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:






Jun 22, 2008
Is Everything We Know Wrong?

 
How do mass hallucinations, patterns of false thinking evolve to the point where what everyone knows turns out to be at best myth? Let's take a look at a few myths that we live with today to understand how this phenomenon occurs, and how Lincoln has profited by this merger of political manipulation and history.
 
Then we'll look at the first times the North brought racism to the South, in the censored story of the Seminole Indian rebellions, A rebellion in which hundreds of former and fugitive slaves battled alongside Indians against federal troops. Why do I say the story is censored? Well, because it is. Consider:
 
Look at any standard reference to American slave revolts, and chances are, the Black Seminole rebellion of 1835-1838 does not even make the list. Below are some representative sites that can be readily checked online:[1] The oversight is not unexpected given that the major scholars of American slavery, on whose writings the reference works rely, have likewise missed or misinterpreted the Black Seminole slave rebellion.
 
How can a rebellion of Indians and Blacks against Federal troops and slave owners have been forgotten in history? We find a key answer in the last lines- current authors on slave rebellions are using older texts that omitted the story. Why was the story omitted in the first place? We'll get to that after we look at two current mass hallucinations, the AIDS crisis and Senator Joe McCarthy. It may seem far away from Lincoln, but it isn't. Recognize one pattern, and you'll recognize that pattern every time it appears.
 
Cut on your TV. You'll see currently running an ad that has teenagers discussing how smoking pot led to a girl having sex and catching AIDS. Ride transit systems? You'll see posters for AIDS Marathons. Watch the news and you'll see people saying that we have failed to do or spend enough on research into AIDS.
 
Now, look at the patterns of your own life. We were told in the 1980's that by now over 6 million heterosexuals would have the disease by the 1990's in this country. That means every single person reading this knows damn well they have not lost heterosexual, non- "shooting up" members of their family. You can see it with your own eyes, but there is a disconnect. Everyone says we are all at risk, conservatives scream sex leads to death, sexual liberation is crushed for an entire generation. Feminists like Andrea Dworkin (who is taught in colleges) proclaim that all heterosexual sex is rape, use the AIDS fears to rush no dating policies at jobs. Liberals berate conservatives for "not doing enough".
 
It doesn't stop there. If you are willing to participate in the AIDS hysteria you get money. Lot's of money. Not just researchers- but in ways you don't even consider. When I started doing plays there was grant money galore for people willing to add to the mass hallucination of the day by doing plays about AIDS. We are talking money from city, state and the feds. This money isn't even included in AIDS awareness campaigns. I put in the press release of my second show and every release since (and I've done over 15 plays and hundreds of events) that I don't take government money and I thought the pouring of money into shows that either blasted conservatives on the issue or gave the impression that heteros were at risk were a waste of time and money. Boy did the reviewers turn on me fast! How could I be so reckless. It turns out someone was reckless, but it wasn't me. Meanwhile because my plays weren't exercises in depression and lecturing, my plays began running 33 weeks to a year and a half. Keep in mind the average small theatre hit runs 6 to 8 weeks here. Having show after show run for months meant no matter what critics blasted me for, entertainment was winning out. What made me know the crisis was a hoax? Well, first let me show you that it was-
 

Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits

A quarter of a century after the outbreak of Aids, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has accepted that the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared.

In the first official admission that the universal prevention strategy promoted by the major Aids organisations may have been misdirected, Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids said there will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.

A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa

 
Back in the 80's I argued that the threat of AIDS and heterosexuals was false. While it was true gays had bathhouses and discos, heteros had swinger clubs (look up PLATO'S RETREAT) and also had promiscuous drug filled sex during the same time, but the only heteros coming down with the disease at the time were people who had been given tainted blood and those who share needles.
 
You can only imagine how that went over. Meanwhile books like AND THE BAND PLAYED ON, hundreds of plays in the 80's and 90's (thankfully they all seem to have vanished) whipped up the hysteria. By 2000, 6 million Americans would be dead from the disease we were told. That would mean every single person would have family members who were straight who had died from the disease. How many straight family members did you lose?
 
Let me guess. Since 1990, the number of straight family members you've lost is zero.
 
There is a problem with catching a false pattern- trust me I spent the last 25 years arguing with people who could not believe what I was saying and writing. Being the first to be correct is often very dangerous. Just ask Joe McCarthy. Same pattern, books use older books to make their points, plays promote the evils of McCarthyism, TV pundits use his name in darkness. Want government money? Put on THE CRUCIBLE or any other play that allows critics to bash McCarthyism. The arts money is waiting for you. But there's a problem. Between the Venona documents and KGB files, we now know that McCarthy was right. Not we in terms of critics, news people, teachers, books- but now even historians have been forced to admit our impressions of the McCarthy age were manipulated lies- another mass hallucination.
 
Most-hated senator was right
Scholars: Joseph McCarthy's charges 'now accepted as fact'

I want you to look very carefully at the above headline. This headline means there was no witch hunt, McCarthy was not paranoid, his whistle blowing was in fact, true.
 
Now, remember every time you have heard, seen or read anti-McCarthy rants. They were what everyone believed. And they were false. Every single attack, every word uttered or read.
 
Back to the article:
 
WASHINGTON -- Although Joseph McCarthy was one of the most demonized American politicians of the last century, new information -- including half-century-old FBI recordings of Soviet embassy conversations -- are showing that McCarthy was right in nearly all his accusations.

"With Joe McCarthy it was the losers who've written the history which condemns him," said Dan Flynn, director of Accuracy in Academia's recent national conference on McCarthy, broadcast by C-SPAN.

Using new information obtained from studies of old Soviet files in Moscow and now the famous Venona Intercepts -- FBI recordings of Soviet embassy communications between 1944-48 -- the record is showing that McCarthy was essentially right. He had many weaknesses, but almost every case he charged has now been proven correct. Whether it was stealing atomic secrets or influencing U.S. foreign policy, communist victories in the 1940s were fed by an incredibly vast spy and influence network.

Hold on folks, there's more:

Asked whether McCarthy had understood all the forces arrayed against him, Herman said no, that McCarthy hadn't realized he'd be fighting against much of the Washington establishment. President Truman was fearful that exposures would reflect on key Democrat officials, he said, and big media and the academic world were very leftist, a heritage of the Depression and World War II. High government officials also feared investigations of their past appointments and associations with people who turned out to be communists or sympathizers.

That was the reason McCarthy was so demonized, he said.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17401

So how many films, plays, books are being done on either the smear campaign or the truth about McCarthy- there are two books with the new information.

That's it.

Meanwhile every time you hear, read or use the word McCarthyism, you are helping to create a false pattern.

Get it yet?

Can you handle the truth? I am the rare bird who enjoys being proven wrong and changing my beliefs. Don't most people prefer to live in the safety of their own delusions?

Especially if they are shared by "everyone"?

Now, let's look at the first time the North used racism in the South, and why that had to be covered up.

The omission from mainstream history of both the Black Seminoles and the slave rebellion that they led is a curious phenomenon. The oversight is all the more interesting since the rebellion was not some obscure event that took place in a rural backwater, but rather a series of large-scale, disruptive escapes that occurred in conjunction with the largest Indian war in U.S. history and that resulted in a massive, well-documented destruction of personal property. http://www.johnhorse.com/highlights/essays/largest.htm

This rebellion took place over 1835-38 and it involved plantation slaves in a classic uprising. The rebellion reached its peak in the first months of 1836, when hundreds of Florida slaves fled their plantations to join the Seminoles. White owners said that their slaves had been "captured" by Indians, but this was merely a gloss on circumstances that horrified the slaveholders. Indians did not capture the slaves. The slaves escaped.[11]

Planning for the mass defections had been underway for over a year. According to Kenneth Wiggins Porter, Black Seminole leaders made frequent visits to Florida's plantations throughout 1835, cementing ties to the field hands. When war erupted, hundreds of blacks fled to the Seminoles in an action that General Thomas Sydney Jesup described as a pre-arranged conspiracy:

"I have ascertained beyond any doubt, not only that a connection exists between a portion of the slave population and the Seminoles, but that there was, before the war commenced, an understanding that a considerable force should join on the first blow being struck."

Field slaves fought prominently in several early engagements. Many defectors painted their faces to signal their new allegiance. Urban and house slaves did their part as well, joining with free blacks from St. Augustine to help the Seminoles obtain critical supplies like powder and lead.[12]

In the general uprising, blacks and Indians specifically targeted the sugar plantations along the St. John's River, west of St. Augustine. At the time these were some of the most developed plantations in all U.S. territory. Their destruction was swift and devastating. By February of 1836, less than two months into the war, the Seminole allies had destroyed 21 plantations. Where slavery and sugar mills once flourished, soldiers found smoking ruins and an industry laid waste.[
13] http://www.johnhorse.com/highlights/essays/largest.htm

In 1819 after Spain sold Florida to the America's 200,000 trained troops marched in to fight the 4000 ex slaves and Indians who were living together. The troops were crushed! Troops were wary to go after them, and the Seminoles continued intermarrying with and welcoming slaves on the run.

In the Battle of Lake Okeechobee 400 Indians and slaves battled over 1000 troops led by future President Zachary Taylor until Taylor retreated. You won't find that battle in history books, because the victors of the Civil War lost that one.

It was racism that drove the troops from the North to Florida:

The two races, the negro and the Indian, are rapidly approximating: they are identical in interests and feelings. Should the Indians remain in this territory the Negroes among them will form a rallying point for runaway negroes from the adjacent states", U.S. Major General Sydney Jesup

The Underground Railroad has long been exposed as a partial myth few actually used, but this was a real threat that drew thousands of runaway slaves to Florida.

So it was decided to use racism on the population of whites that had written off runaway slaves as "captured by Indians" so as to avoid confrontation. It was the first time we know of that the North injected racism into an area it had not existed before.

So here are the roots, reconstruction was the result.

 

Posted at 08:32 am by Psychomike

 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry